NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Tesla K80m

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
20.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 108.3 GTexel / s
3.7x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 1344
3.4x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 2,599 gflops
8x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 3 GB
Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18416 vs 12737
Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 vs 34.836
Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1653.567 vs 960.114
Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 59.57
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.278 vs 81.753
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 vs 3.038

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2014 vs 12 March 2014
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 108.3 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2496 vs 1344
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops vs 2,599 gflops
Maximum memory size	2x 12 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	18416 vs 12737
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	62.651 vs 34.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1653.567 vs 960.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	86.984 vs 59.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	258.278 vs 81.753
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.882 vs 3.038

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Around 67% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 876 MHz
3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 300 Watt

Core clock speed	941 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed	967 MHz vs 876 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

18416

12737

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

62.651

34.836

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1653.567

960.114

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

86.984

59.57

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

258.278

81.753

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.882

3.038

Name	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Geekbench - OpenCL	18416	12737
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	62.651	34.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1653.567	960.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	86.984	59.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	258.278	81.753
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.882	3.038
PassMark - G3D Mark		3473
PassMark - G2D Mark		277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		6350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		6350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1336

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GK210	GK104
Launch date	17 November 2014	12 March 2014
Place in performance rating	733	735
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	967 MHz
Core clock speed	562 MHz	941 MHz
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops	2,599 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2x 2496	1344
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec	108.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	300 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	7,080 million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		1344
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2x 12 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	2x 240.6 GB / s	120.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	2x 384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA