NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M versus AMD Radeon HD 8870M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and AMD Radeon HD 8870M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 967 MHz versus 725 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 108.3 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 640
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,599 gflops versus 992.0 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3473 versus 1638
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12737 versus 8804
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.836 versus 24.097
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 960.114 versus 465.496
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.038 versus 2.211
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 versus 38.126
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.3 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,599 gflops versus 992.0 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3473 versus 1638 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12737 versus 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 versus 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 versus 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 versus 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 versus 38.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3702 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8870M
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 629 versus 277
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.848 versus 81.753
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 629 versus 277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.848 versus 81.753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | AMD Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3473 | 1638 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 | 629 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12737 | 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | 38.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | 106.848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | AMD Radeon HD 8870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Venus |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 735 | 736 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,599 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.3 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Unités de Compute | 10 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 120.0 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
