NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.2x more boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 90.3x more texture fill rate: 108.3 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s
- 336x more pipelines: 1344 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 71.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3450 vs 48
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 276 vs 236
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 1 June 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3450 vs 48 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 276 vs 236 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 100 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3450 | 48 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 276 | 236 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12539 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
| Code name | GK104 | G72 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 1 June 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 733 | 736 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 300 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s | 1.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 112 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s | 4.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 600 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 64 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| CineFX 4.0 | ||
| Intellisample 4.0 | ||
| PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
| UltraShadow II | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 110M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
