NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro S7150

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and AMD FirePro S7150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 5000 MHz

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150

  • Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1026 MHz
  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 57.12 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,828 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Core clock speed 1050 MHz vs 1026 MHz
Texture fill rate 117.6 GTexel / s vs 57.12 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1792 vs 768
Floating-point performance 3,763 gflops vs 1,828 gflops
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 2 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150

Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power AMD FirePro S7150
PassMark - G3D Mark 3770
PassMark - G2D Mark 414
Geekbench - OpenCL 27103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 570.969
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.687
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 23.637
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6147
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 4359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 583
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6147
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 4359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 583

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power AMD FirePro S7150

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 3.0
Code name GM206 Tonga
Launch date 1 March 2016 1 February 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $159 $2,399
Place in performance rating not rated 657
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1190 MHz
Core clock speed 1026 MHz 1050 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,828 gflops 3,763 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1792
Texture fill rate 57.12 GTexel / s 117.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 2,940 million 5,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 202 mm 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 105.8 GB / s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power with others

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2 AMD
FirePro S7150 x2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
vs AMD FirePro S7150 AMD
FirePro S7150
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 950 LP