NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro S7150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and AMD FirePro S7150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1026 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 57.12 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,828 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1026 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 117.6 GTexel / s vs 57.12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops vs 1,828 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power | AMD FirePro S7150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3208 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27025 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 583 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power | AMD FirePro S7150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM206 | Tonga |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 1 February 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $2,399 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 655 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1026 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,828 gflops | 3,763 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 57.12 GTexel / s | 117.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 202 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 105.8 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |