NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 M260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 715 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- 5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 M260X |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM206 | Opal |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 | 6 December 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1208 | 1209 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 715 MHz |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s | 17.16 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |