NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs ATI Radeon 9800 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and ATI Radeon 9800 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 331 MHz
- 45.9x more texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 8.6x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 580 MHz
Launch date | 1 January 2016 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 331 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 1.324 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 580 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 SE
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | ATI Radeon 9800 SE |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | ATI Radeon 9800 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Rage 8 |
Code name | GM206 | R350 |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 | 1 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1207 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 331 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s | 1.324 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Floppy |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 9.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 580 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |