NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD FirePro W2100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and AMD FirePro W2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 630 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 680 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 320
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 vs 10.438
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 vs 289.646
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 vs 0.991
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.323 vs 19.794
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.304 vs 50.338
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 vs 12 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 630 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 680 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 435.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 vs 10.438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 vs 289.646 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 vs 0.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 vs 19.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 vs 50.338 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W2100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | AMD FirePro W2100 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | 10.438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | 289.646 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | 0.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | 19.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | 50.338 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 859 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | AMD FirePro W2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM206 | Oland |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 | 12 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1208 | 1210 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 630 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops | 435.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,040 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | n / a |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Powerplay |