AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 1 January 2016 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 vs 12.111
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 vs 253.178
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 vs 1.211
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.323 vs 23.777
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.304 vs 73.506
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 vs 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 vs 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 vs 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 vs 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 vs 73.506 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 915 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5767 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 56.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 917.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 3.351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 37.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 86.304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Oland | GM206 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 1 January 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1210 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 950 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 924 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 1,946 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 60.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |