NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 vs 14.332
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 vs 265.424
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 vs 1.093
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.323 vs 15.009
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.304 vs 38.219
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 vs 1 March 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 732.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 vs 14.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 vs 265.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 vs 1.093 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 vs 15.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 vs 38.219 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 924 MHz
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 924 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | 14.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | 265.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | 1.093 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | 15.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | 38.219 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1580 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2446 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1974 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2446 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1974 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM206 | GK107 |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1210 | 1212 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $164.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops | 732.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s | 30.53 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 202 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |