NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 975 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5339 vs 4470
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 2810
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 3264
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 2810
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 3264
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1871 vs 1745
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 August 2015 vs 19 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5339 vs 4470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 vs 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 vs 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1871 vs 1745 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 93.6 GTexel / s vs 49.2 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
- Around 64% better floating-point performance: 2,995 gflops vs 1,825 gflops
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 vs 644
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.399 vs 60.473
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.47 vs 758.865
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.313 vs 4.279
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.519 vs 29.738
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 345.793 vs 231.508
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 93.6 GTexel / s vs 49.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops vs 1,825 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 vs 644 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.399 vs 60.473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.47 vs 758.865 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.313 vs 4.279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.519 vs 29.738 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 345.793 vs 231.508 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5339 | 4470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 644 | 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16110 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | 65.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | 1230.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | 6.313 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | 78.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | 345.793 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1871 | 1745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM206 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 20 August 2015 | 19 November 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $270 |
Place in performance rating | 535 | 537 |
Price now | $194.44 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | 975 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 925 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | 2,995 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec | 93.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 105.6 GB / s | 192.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.6 GB/s | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |