NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1024 MHz
  • Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1188 MHz
  • Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 49.2 billion / sec
  • Around 4% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,825 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 91% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 90 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 1001.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3697
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3697
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 February 2017 vs 20 August 2015
Core clock speed 1303 MHz vs 1024 MHz
Boost clock speed 1493 MHz vs 1188 MHz
Texture fill rate 59.2 GTexel / s vs 49.2 billion / sec
Floating-point performance 1,894 gflops vs 1,825 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 47 Watt vs 90 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3697

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 5923
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 5923
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6803 vs 5923
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6803 vs 5923

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3697
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5923
6803
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5923
6803
Name NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5923 6803
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5923 6803
PassMark - G3D Mark 5339
PassMark - G2D Mark 644
Geekbench - OpenCL 16110
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 60.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 758.865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 231.508
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1871

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Maxwell 2.0
Code name GP107 GM206
Launch date 7 February 2017 20 August 2015
Place in performance rating 532 533
Type Workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $159
Price now $194.44
Value for money (0-100) 30.06

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1493 MHz 1188 MHz
Core clock speed 1303 MHz 1024 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,894 gflops 1,825 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 768
Texture fill rate 59.2 GTexel / s 49.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 47 Watt 90 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 2,940 million
CUDA cores 768

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 7.938" (20.2 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
SLI options 2x
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pins

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s 105.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 6.6 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround