NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A vs NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A and NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16.6x more texture fill rate: 39.72 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 513.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2568 vs 5
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 262 vs 194
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 19 February 2002 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2568 vs 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 vs 194 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2568 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10292 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1973 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1973 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2188 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3289 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kelvin |
Code name | GM107 | NV25 A2 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 19 February 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 916 | 913 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 63 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |