NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A

Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 46% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 628 MHz
Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 657 MHz
Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,271 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2568 vs 1226
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2188 vs 953
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2188 vs 953
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3289 vs 1552
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3289 vs 1552

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 March 2015 vs 17 March 2014
Core clock speed	914 MHz vs 628 MHz
Boost clock speed	993 MHz vs 657 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,271 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2568 vs 1226
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2188 vs 953
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2188 vs 953
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3289 vs 1552
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3289 vs 1552

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 39.72 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 262

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s vs 39.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	384 vs 262

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2568

1226

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

262

384

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2188

953

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2188

953

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3289

1552

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3289

1552

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
PassMark - G3D Mark	2568	1226
PassMark - G2D Mark	262	384
Geekbench - OpenCL	10292
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1973
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1973
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2188	953
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2188	953
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3289	1552
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3289	1552

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK106
Launch date	13 March 2015	17 March 2014
Place in performance rating	916	917
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz	657 MHz
Core clock speed	914 MHz	628 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,271 gflops	1,009 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	768
Texture fill rate	39.72 GTexel / s	42.05 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	2,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	64.13 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	4008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5