NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A vs AMD FirePro W600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A and AMD FirePro W600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 39.72 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 1,271 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2568 vs 1671
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10292 vs 6185
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2188 vs 1555
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2188 vs 1555
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3289 vs 3250
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3289 vs 3250
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 13 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops vs 768.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2568 vs 1671 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10292 vs 6185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2188 vs 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2188 vs 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3289 vs 3250 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 vs 3250 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W600
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 262
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2331 vs 1973
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2331 vs 1973
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2331 vs 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2331 vs 1973 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | AMD FirePro W600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2568 | 1671 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 | 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10292 | 6185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1973 | 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1973 | 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2188 | 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2188 | 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3289 | 3250 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 | 3250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.116 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | AMD FirePro W600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 13 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 915 | 918 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 39.72 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |