NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 M360
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 76.687 vs 19.479
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 890.785 vs 575.773
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 November 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 vs 19.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 vs 575.773 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 28.659
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 vs 28.659 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 | 19.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 | 575.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.659 | 34.15 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1836 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 451 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8493 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1623 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1623 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM206 | Tropo |
| Launch date | 26 November 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 961 | 962 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1176 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 8 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
AMDRadeon 680M
