NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1168.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 76.687 vs 36.256
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 November 2015 vs 16 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 vs 36.256 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 76.86 GTexel / s
- Around 31% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1024
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 890.785
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 28.659
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 76.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 1024 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 890.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 28.659 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 | 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 | 1029.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.659 | 45.894 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4407 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.001 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM206 | GK104 |
Launch date | 26 November 2015 | 16 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 961 | 736 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1176 MHz | 915 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |