NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 32.7x more texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- 128x more pipelines: 1024 vs 8
- 107.7x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 65.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 93
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 334
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 January 2015 vs 15 August 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1127 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 72 billion / sec vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6111 vs 93 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 334 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 171.4x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6111 | 93 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 334 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18734 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GM206 | G98 |
| Launch date | 22 January 2015 | 15 August 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 514 | 516 |
| Price now | $229.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1127 MHz | 550 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops | 22.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 72 billion / sec | 2.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| SLI options | 2x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
