NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1127 MHz
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 792.44
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 35.338
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 200.825

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
• Around 27% better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6065 vs 4451
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 602
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18323 vs 15667
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 71.86
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 vs 4.039
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 6796
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 6796
• Around 43% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2283 vs 1591

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4451 6065
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	602 675
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 18323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1591 2283

Compare specifications (specs)