NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 680 MHz
8x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s
5.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 120
8.5x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 163.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
10.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2411 vs 232
Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 331

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 March 2015 vs 7 January 2008
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 680 MHz
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 120
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 163.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2411 vs 232
PassMark - G2D Mark	631 vs 331

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670

2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2411

232

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

631

331

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
PassMark - G3D Mark	2411	232
PassMark - G2D Mark	631	331
Geekbench - OpenCL	12495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	49.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	757.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	49.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	179.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7859

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A	ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Code name	GM107	M86
Launch date	13 March 2015	7 January 2008
Place in performance rating	475	478
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	680 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	163.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	640	120
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s	5.44 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	378 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2 / GDDR3 / GDDR4
Shared memory		0