NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon R7 M270DX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and AMD Radeon R7 M270DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 940 MHz
  • 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3821 vs 962
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 233
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 9 January 2015 vs 11 June 2014
Core clock speed 944 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 950 MHz vs 940 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3821 vs 962
PassMark - G2D Mark 345 vs 233

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270DX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3821
962
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
345
233
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
PassMark - G3D Mark 3821 962
PassMark - G2D Mark 345 233
Geekbench - OpenCL 14467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 67.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 720.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 57.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 223.296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1831

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M AMD Radeon R7 M270DX

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 3.0
Code name GM204 Topaz
Launch date 9 January 2015 11 June 2014
Place in performance rating 666 667
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz 940 MHz
Core clock speed 944 MHz 900 MHz
CUDA cores 1024
Floating-point performance 2,355 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024
Texture fill rate 73.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
G-SYNC support
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support 1

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) IGP
Laptop size large
SLI options 1
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI