NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 706 MHz
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 2,355 gflops vs 2,169 gflops
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 122 Watt
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14467 vs 11456
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.59 vs 31.318
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 720.592 vs 681.141
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.903 vs 3.062
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.947 vs 32.922
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.296 vs 67.311
• Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1831 vs 1351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000

• Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 73.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3988 vs 3824
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 346
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6288 vs 5783
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 2566
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6288 vs 5783
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 2566

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3824 3988
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	346 436
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14467 11456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.59 31.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	720.592 681.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.903 3.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.947 32.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	223.296 67.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5783 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2566 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5783 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2566 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1831 1351

Compare specifications (specs)