NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 2x 320
- 5.8x better floating-point performance: 4,981 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 13.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11112 vs 822
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 vs 4 April 2008 |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 2x 320 |
Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11112 vs 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 144 billion / sec
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 165 Watt
- 236.6x more memory clock speed: 1656 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 144 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 165 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1656 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11112 | 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34898 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 110.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1348.307 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.194 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 477.015 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 474 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | RV670 |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 | 4 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 379 | 381 |
Price now | $605.06 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2048 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops | 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 666 million |
Core clock speed | 669 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 2x 53.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |