NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P3000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 165 Watt
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3690
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3335
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3690
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3335
7.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3489 vs 474

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 19 September 2014
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 165 Watt
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9579 vs 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9579 vs 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3489 vs 474

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11114 vs 6449
Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 415
Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34898 vs 25811

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1216 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Pipelines	2048 vs 1280
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11114 vs 6449
PassMark - G2D Mark	791 vs 415
Geekbench - OpenCL	34898 vs 25811

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6449

11114

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

415

791

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

25811

34898

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9579

9566

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3690

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3335

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9579

9566

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

3690

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3335

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3489

474

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P3000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
PassMark - G3D Mark	6449	11114
PassMark - G2D Mark	415	791
Geekbench - OpenCL	25811	34898
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9579	9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720	3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9579	9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720	3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3489	474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		110.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1348.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		9.194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		37.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		477.015

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P3000	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	N17E-Q1	GM204
Launch date	11 January 2017	19 September 2014
Place in performance rating	379	380
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$549
Price now		$605.06
Value for money (0-100)		21.18
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	1216 MHz
Core clock speed	1088 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1280	2048
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	165 Watt
CUDA cores		2048
Floating-point performance		4,981 gflops
Texture fill rate		144 billion / sec
Transistor count		5,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Port	1.4
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
Display Connectors		1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		1
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
VGA аnalog display support		1
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.1
OpenCL		1.2
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	168 GB / s	224 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Stereo
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
BatteryBoost
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
SLI
Surround
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		500 Watt
SLI options		1
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pins