NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 40x more texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 38.4x more pipelines: 3072 vs 80
- 69.7x better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 24x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 512 MB
- 253.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12919 vs 51
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 836 vs 482
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 March 2015 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 192 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12919 vs 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 836 vs 482 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
- 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 171.4x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12919 | 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 836 | 482 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.566 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.245 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.225 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 518.554 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9834 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9834 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5332 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM200 | RV620 |
| Launch date | 17 March 2015 | 1 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 319 | 327 |
| Price now | $1,999.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 192 billion / sec | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 8,000 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x VHDCI |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 170 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 1024SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X vs
NVIDIAP102-100
