NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 vs 109.521
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 vs 1206.829
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 vs 9.88
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 vs 511.984
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 vs 10113
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2900
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 vs 10113
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2900
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 vs 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 vs 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 vs 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 vs 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 2900 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 34.491
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 vs 34.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 | 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | 117.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 | 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40270 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Place in performance rating | 329 | 330 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | |
Code name | Polaris 20 | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1200 MHz |
CUDA cores | 3840 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPort, HDMI | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.4 in | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 in | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 547.7 GB/s | 256.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |