NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs AMD Radeon Pro 580
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp und AMD Radeon Pro 580 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Etwa 32% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1582 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Um etwa 50% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 vs 109.521
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 vs 1206.829
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 vs 9.88
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 vs 511.984
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 vs 10113
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2900
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 vs 10113
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2900
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1582 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 vs 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 vs 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 vs 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 vs 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 2900 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Etwa 67% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 34.491
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 vs 34.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3343 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 | 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | 117.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 | 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40270 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 329 | 330 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | |
Codename | Polaris 20 | |
Startdatum | 5 June 2017 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1582 MHz | 1200 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 3840 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1100 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 6,175 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 2304 | |
Texturfüllrate | 193.0 GTexel / s | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | DisplayPort, HDMI | No outputs |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 4.4 in | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 10.5 in | 241 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 547.7 GB/s | 256.0 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 6780 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |