NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs ATI FireMV 2260
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z and ATI FireMV 2260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 705 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 140.8x more texture fill rate: 338 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- 144x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 40
- 210.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 256 MB
- 76.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 117
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 vs 488
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2014 vs 1 January 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 705 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 338 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops vs 48 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 vs 117 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 vs 488 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2260
- 25x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 142.9x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2260
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | ATI FireMV 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 | 117 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 | 488 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2226 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2226 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | ATI FireMV 2260 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK110B | RV620 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2014 | 1 January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 336 | 338 |
| Price now | $1,580 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 705 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 5760 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | 48 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 338 billion / sec | 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 375 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||

