NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 88% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 705 MHz
• Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 876 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 375 Watt
• 1001.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34221 vs 22732
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 8124
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2226
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 8124
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

• 3.5x more texture fill rate: 338 billion / sec vs 96.8 GTexel / s
• 4.5x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 1280
• 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 8740
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 vs 448

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8740 8905
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	448 639
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	34221 22732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12948 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12948 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2226

Compare specifications (specs)