NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs ATI FireGL V8650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 688 MHz
- 17x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 11.01 GTexel / s
- 8.4x more pipelines: 2688 vs 320
- 10.7x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 14.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8180 vs 550
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 February 2013 vs 14 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 688 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec vs 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8180 vs 550 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8650
- 289.3x more memory clock speed: 1736 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 627
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1736 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 vs 627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI FireGL V8650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8180 | 550 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 | 637 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI FireGL V8650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK110 | R600 |
| Launch date | 19 February 2013 | 14 May 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $2,799 |
| Place in performance rating | 428 | 405 |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 688 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 2688 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec | 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 254 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 111.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384-bit GDDR5 | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1736 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
ATIFirePro V8700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4350
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5165
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
NVIDIAP106-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X
