NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs ATI FireGL V8650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 688 MHz
- 17x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 11.01 GTexel / s
- 8.4x more pipelines: 2688 vs 320
- 10.7x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 14.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8194 vs 550
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 649 vs 637
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 February 2013 vs 14 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 688 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec vs 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8194 vs 550 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 vs 637 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8650
- 289.3x more memory clock speed: 1736 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1736 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI FireGL V8650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8194 | 550 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 649 | 637 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24530 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI FireGL V8650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK110 | R600 |
| Launch date | 19 February 2013 | 14 May 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $2,799 |
| Place in performance rating | 422 | 434 |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 688 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 2688 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec | 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 254 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 111.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384-bit GDDR5 | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1736 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AMDFirePro R5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AppleM1 8-core
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AppleM1 7-core
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
IntelArc A550M
