NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs ATI FirePro V8700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and ATI FirePro V8700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 6.3x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 30 GTexel / s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 2688 vs 800
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 1,200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8209 vs 1539
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 638 vs 527
- 22x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 152.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 February 2013 vs 11 September 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec vs 30 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 800 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 1,200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8209 vs 1539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 638 vs 527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 152.6 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8700
- Around 66% lower typical power consumption: 151 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 566.7x more memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8543 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8543 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8700
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI FirePro V8700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8209 | 1539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 638 | 527 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24400 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 8543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 152.6 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI FirePro V8700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK110 | RV770 |
| Launch date | 19 February 2013 | 11 September 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $1,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 434 | 435 |
| Price now | $2,054.59 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 750 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2688 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 2688 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec | 30 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 254 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384-bit GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 3400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
ATIFirePro V8700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5165
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
AMDRadeon R9 280
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
NVIDIAP106-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN vs
IntelArc A550M
