NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 669 MHz
- 4.2x more pipelines: 2688 vs 2x 320
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 10x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 vs 822
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 February 2013 vs 4 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 2x 320 |
Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 vs 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 187.5 billion / sec
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 276x more memory clock speed: 1656 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 187.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1656 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8190 | 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK110 | RV670 |
Launch date | 19 February 2013 | 4 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 428 | 344 |
Price now | $2,054.59 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 669 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2688 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2688 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 2x 53.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384-bit GDDR5 | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |