NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 753 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 256 vs 144
- 3x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 551
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 189 vs 171
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4256 vs 2520
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 800
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 800
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 1833
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 1833
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2418
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2418
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 753 MHz |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 144 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 vs 551 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 vs 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 vs 2520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 vs 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 vs 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2418 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 | 551 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 | 2520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.332 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GF116 |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 891 | 1451 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 753 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 144 |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
| CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |

