NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and AMD Radeon R9 M375X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

AMD Radeon R9 M375X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 4% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 925 MHz
4.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1125 MHz
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 1333
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 1333
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2185
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2185

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	965 MHz vs 925 MHz
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 2185
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 2185

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X

Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1015 MHz vs 993 MHz
Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
Around 70% better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1715 vs 1417
Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 320 vs 189
Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8255 vs 4256
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3548 vs 2197
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3548 vs 2197

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1015 MHz vs 993 MHz
Texture fill rate	40.6 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 256
Floating-point performance	1,299 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1715 vs 1417
PassMark - G2D Mark	320 vs 189
Geekbench - OpenCL	8255 vs 4256
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3548 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3548 vs 2197

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1417

1715

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

189

320

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4256

8255

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

3548

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

3548

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

1333

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

1333

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

2185

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

2185

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	AMD Radeon R9 M375X
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417	1715
PassMark - G2D Mark	189	320
Geekbench - OpenCL	4256	8255
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197	3548
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197	3548
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502	1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502	1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	2185
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	2185

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	AMD Radeon R9 M375X
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Code name	GM108	Tropo
Launch date	17 November 2017	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	891	893
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz	1015 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	925 MHz
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	1,299 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	640
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s	40.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt
Compute units		10
Transistor count		1,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	72 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore