NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 61% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 600 MHz
5x more texture fill rate: 23.83 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
2.1x more pipelines: 256 vs 120
5.3x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 144 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
6.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 211
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1693
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1693

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 28 June 2007
Core clock speed	965 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	256 vs 120
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops vs 144 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417 vs 211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 1693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 1693

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 vs 189

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	337 vs 189

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1417

211

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

189

337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

1693

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

1693

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417	211
PassMark - G2D Mark	189	337
Geekbench - OpenCL	4256
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	1693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	1693

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale
Code name	GM108	RV630
Launch date	17 November 2017	28 June 2007
Place in performance rating	891	889
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	144 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	256	120
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s	4.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count		390 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	16 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	DDR2
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers