NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt

Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 12 March 2014
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 45 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
Around 51% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2519 vs 1426
Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 188
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9754 vs 4269
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 2197
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 2197
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3502
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3502

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	36.08 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 256
Floating-point performance	1,155 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2519 vs 1426
PassMark - G2D Mark	225 vs 188
Geekbench - OpenCL	9754 vs 4269
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3817 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3817 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 3502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 3502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1426

2519

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

188

225

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4269

9754

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3353

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1426	2519
PassMark - G2D Mark	188	225
Geekbench - OpenCL	4269	9754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		151.016
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		979

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM108	GM107
Launch date	17 November 2017	12 March 2014
Place in performance rating	916	918
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	1,155 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	640
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s	36.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	45 Watt
CUDA cores		640
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Standard memory configuration		DDR3 or GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers
3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
SLI
TXAA