NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs AMD FirePro W600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and AMD FirePro W600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 1555
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 1555
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3250
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3250
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 13 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3250 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3250 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W600
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1676 vs 1429
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 586 vs 188
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6185 vs 4265
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2331 vs 2197
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2331 vs 2197
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1676 vs 1429 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 vs 188 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6185 vs 4265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2331 vs 2197 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2331 vs 2197 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | AMD FirePro W600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1429 | 1676 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 586 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4265 | 6185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 2331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 1555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3250 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.116 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | AMD FirePro W600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 13 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 916 | 919 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 163 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |