NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz

Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 13 March 2015
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 965 MHz
Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 993 MHz
Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 47.04 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
Around 97% better floating-point performance: 1,505 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3366 vs 1417
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 vs 189
2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10985 vs 4256
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 2197
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 2197
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3502
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3502

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1096 MHz vs 965 MHz
Boost clock speed	1176 MHz vs 993 MHz
Texture fill rate	47.04 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 256
Floating-point performance	1,505 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3366 vs 1417
PassMark - G2D Mark	245 vs 189
Geekbench - OpenCL	10985 vs 4256
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5264 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5264 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714 vs 3502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714 vs 3502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1417

3366

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

189

245

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4256

10985

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

5264

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

5264

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3358

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417	3366
PassMark - G2D Mark	189	245
Geekbench - OpenCL	4256	10985
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197	5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197	5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		54.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		795.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		51.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		174.513
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1231

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM108	GM107
Launch date	17 November 2017	13 March 2015
Place in performance rating	891	735
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz	1176 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	1096 MHz
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	1,505 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	640
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s	47.04 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	75 Watt
CUDA cores		640
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		1
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support		1
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
DSR
GameStream
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
SLI