NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 775 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• 3.2x better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1814 vs 551
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 144
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6461 vs 2530
• 11.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 2.692
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 406.203 vs 161.29
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 vs 0.55
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 11.858
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 17.753
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 vs 1263
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 2479
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3327
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 vs 1263
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 2479
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3327

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 551
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	195 144
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6461 2530
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.613 2.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	406.203 161.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.034 0.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.251 11.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.608 17.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3327

Compare specifications (specs)