NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 924 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 86.304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 1 January 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz vs 924 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 vs 86.304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- 2x more texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 2x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 vs 31.613
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 vs 406.203
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 vs 2.034
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.323 vs 30.251
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 vs 31.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 vs 406.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 vs 2.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 vs 30.251 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1856 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 56.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 917.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 3.351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 37.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 86.304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GM108 | GM206 |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 1 January 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1043 | 1175 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | 950 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 924 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 1,946 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 60.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |