NVIDIA GeForce MX150 versus AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 25x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 2852
- 80.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 46
- 26.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 125.7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 23 November 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 2852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 125.7 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 108.8 GTexel / s versus 46.98 GTexel / s
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 384
- 3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,482 gflops versus 1,127 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 9% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5448 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.778 versus 45.905
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1285.141 versus 495.238
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.839 versus 2.365
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.347 versus 38.965
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 321.767 versus 145.794
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7037 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s versus 46.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops versus 1,127 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5448 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 versus 45.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 versus 495.238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 versus 2.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 versus 38.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 versus 145.794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2265 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9599 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 71.778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 1285.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 5.839 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 75.347 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 321.767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 7037 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 125.7 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | GP108 | Amethyst |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 23 November 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 899 | 901 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 5,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB / s | 174.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5448 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX150 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
