NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2277 vs 1978
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9414 vs 8750
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 450.087
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 25.346
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 67.077
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1668
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 2846
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1668

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 215
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 45.905
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 2.365

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2277 1978
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	215 361
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9414 8750
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 49.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 450.087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 3.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 25.346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 67.077
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 2846
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 2846
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3355

Compare specifications (specs)