NVIDIA GeForce MX150 versus Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1038 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 5.3x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 72
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2278 versus 1978
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9425 versus 8759
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 versus 450.087
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 versus 25.346
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 versus 67.077
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 1668
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 versus 2846
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 1668
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 1 September 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 72 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 15 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2278 versus 1978 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9425 versus 8759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 versus 450.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 versus 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 versus 67.077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 versus 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 versus 215
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 versus 45.905
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 versus 2.365
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 versus 215 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 versus 45.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 versus 2.365 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2278 | 1978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 215 | 361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9425 | 8759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 49.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 450.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 3.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 67.077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 990 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.0 |
| Nom de code | GP108 | Skylake GT4e |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 905 | 993 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 72 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX150 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1150 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
