NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 33.9 billion / sec
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 64 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2259 vs 1749
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9584 vs 4493
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 12.582
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 364.463
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 1.254
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 18.386
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 23.499
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 2663
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3478
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3332
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 2663
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3478
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3332
• Around 83% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 545

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 213

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2259 1749
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 368
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9584 4493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 23.499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 545

Compare specifications (specs)