NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 823 MHz
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 888 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 13x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 130 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 32.718
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 67.697
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3665
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3325
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3665
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

• Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
• 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
• Around 82% better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 vs 495.238
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 vs 2.365
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 vs 38.965
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 vs 4330
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 vs 4330

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 32.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 1021.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 3.143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 56.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 67.697
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 5983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3665
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 5983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3665
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3325

Compare specifications (specs)