NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9584 vs 9306
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 34.239
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 2.341
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 32
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 69.814

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 2259
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 213
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 vs 495.238
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 4330
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 4330
• Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 vs 999

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2259 3337
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 515
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9584 9306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 2.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 69.814
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 1050

Compare specifications (specs)