NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 42.463
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 26.532
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 133.458
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3329
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3329
• 8.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2259
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 213
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 9584
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 495.238
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.365
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 4330
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 4330

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2259 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9584 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 117

Compare specifications (specs)