NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 37.761
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 388.248
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 3817
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3685
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 3817
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3685
• Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 979

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 vs 2259
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 213
• Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 vs 9584
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 2.365
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 145.794

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2259 2521
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9584 9809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 979

Compare specifications (specs)