NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 12x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 35.338
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3335
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3335
• 6.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 162

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 46.98 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 2259
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 213
• Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 vs 9584
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 45.905
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 792.44 vs 495.238
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 vs 2.365
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 vs 145.794
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 4330
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 4330

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2259 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9584 18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 162

Compare specifications (specs)