NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 vs 24.676
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1582 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 1830
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 214
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 6740
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 21.591
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 445.82
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.736
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 102.234
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 2680
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 2680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1830 5918
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	214 323
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6740 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.591 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	445.82 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.736 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.43 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.234 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3336

Compare specifications (specs)