NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 928 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 11x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 110 Watt
• 1201.6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 vs 28.29
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 vs 47.404
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3335
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 1830
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 214
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 vs 6740
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 vs 21.591
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 445.82
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 1.736
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 2680
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 2680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1830 2527
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	214 416
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6740 7900
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.591 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	445.82 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.736 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.43 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.234 47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3335

Compare specifications (specs)